As I drove to work this morning, someone on the radio said that the Democrats are Redcoats--that is, they are literally destroying our freedoms, and we need a Revolution--and fortunately, wo can accomplish this Revolution via the ballot box.
Now, if the Democrats are Redcoats, what does that make Republicans? My vote is for Tories, because they are people who ought to be for freedom, but more often than not, they aren't.
Trash PARC: Trash Panda Arcane Research Center
Exploring the small things in life: it's the small things that count the most!
Friday, October 22, 2010
Intolerance is now a medical condition?
I am currently working with medical data at my work. Sprinkled among that data are Medicare/Medicaid codes of various conditions, that have now become rather standard in the medical industry. As I checked up on my list of extracted codes, I noticed this one:
Actually, I have a funny feeling that here, "increased intolerance" means "we're giving the guy the medicine, but it's not working as effective as before" rather than "yeah, I used to like hippies, but you know, they've been getting on my nerves lately". :-)
SNM:102461004 increased intolerance CODEIt seems now that increased intolerance is now something diagnosable. I wonder what treatments are available for hate?
Actually, I have a funny feeling that here, "increased intolerance" means "we're giving the guy the medicine, but it's not working as effective as before" rather than "yeah, I used to like hippies, but you know, they've been getting on my nerves lately". :-)
Monday, October 18, 2010
Getting a nebulizer
My son is currently having respiratory problems: he's congested, and he wheezes a bit. We're a little bit afraid that he may have gotten asthma while we lived briefly in our old place--after all, he slept in the room that seemed hardest hit by the "funny smell" problem. We took him (and his sister, too, who had some problems as well) to the doctor--who then tried a certain ashma medication on both. Since it seemed to have no effect on my daughter, but seemed to improve my son's breathing, my daughter got a prescription for antibiotics, and my son got a prescription for this asthma medication.
When we looked into purchasing a nebulizer for our own use, we discovered a funny thing: nebulizers, locally bought, are expensive, but we could find incredibly cheap nebulizers on the internet. I wonder why that is, but I suspect that part of it may be that some on-line companies that sell nebulizers don't accept insurance, so they don't have to accept The Game that insurance companies--especially State Ones, like Medicare, Medicaid, and New York's Empire Plan--play: they cover part of the cost, and demand that the patient only pays a certain amount, and expect the provider of the good or service to "eat" the rest.
Since we needed a nebulizer immediately, we couldn't buy one online, but we decided to rent one for this month, and if we needed to, we would then buy one at the end of this month.
As I've used this nebulizer, though, I've come to understand exactly what it is: a simple air compressor that atomizes a liquid--indeed, it only pumps air to the little piece of plastic that actually does the atomizing--to make it breathable for infants and toddlers, who can't use an inhaler properly. Having learned this, it would seem reasonable to expect that such a device would only cost $35 to $60 (on-line only--more expensive models may also have been available)...and that the $100 to $210 price tag on locally-sold devices seems uncalled-for!
In the end, it's probably best that we rented: although this drug seemed to help in the doctor's office, now that we've tried it for a week, it seems to have had no effect on my son's breathing. It's likely we'll be trying antibiotics on him, too.
When we looked into purchasing a nebulizer for our own use, we discovered a funny thing: nebulizers, locally bought, are expensive, but we could find incredibly cheap nebulizers on the internet. I wonder why that is, but I suspect that part of it may be that some on-line companies that sell nebulizers don't accept insurance, so they don't have to accept The Game that insurance companies--especially State Ones, like Medicare, Medicaid, and New York's Empire Plan--play: they cover part of the cost, and demand that the patient only pays a certain amount, and expect the provider of the good or service to "eat" the rest.
Since we needed a nebulizer immediately, we couldn't buy one online, but we decided to rent one for this month, and if we needed to, we would then buy one at the end of this month.
As I've used this nebulizer, though, I've come to understand exactly what it is: a simple air compressor that atomizes a liquid--indeed, it only pumps air to the little piece of plastic that actually does the atomizing--to make it breathable for infants and toddlers, who can't use an inhaler properly. Having learned this, it would seem reasonable to expect that such a device would only cost $35 to $60 (on-line only--more expensive models may also have been available)...and that the $100 to $210 price tag on locally-sold devices seems uncalled-for!
In the end, it's probably best that we rented: although this drug seemed to help in the doctor's office, now that we've tried it for a week, it seems to have had no effect on my son's breathing. It's likely we'll be trying antibiotics on him, too.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Examples of Failures of LEDs
While driving around this morning, I noticed a few LED arrarys in traffic lights that are dying: one red light, and two green lights. Each light has patches that were dark, and patches that were flickering at various states of brightness.
Besides wondering what the heck is causing these LEDs to die in this way (could it be a ban on lead solder?), these lights have caused me to ask another question: Is LED lighting really ready to take the place of incandescents?
I currently rent my home, and both finances and space are tight for me. Thus, stockpiling incandescent lights are impractical at this moment. I hate fluorescent lights, so I have hopes that LEDs will be ready and affordable after incandescent lights are banned. And while I expect that the Free Market will win in the end, we, unfortunately do not have a Free Market--as illustrated by the ban of incandescent light bulbs.
But seeing these lights flicker have caused me to wonder: will the LED lights really last as long as claimed? We already know that fluorescent lights don't--turning them on and off like we do incandescents are abusive to those lights, as is putting them in enclosures and in ceiling fans.
We really should let the Free Market work these details out!
Besides wondering what the heck is causing these LEDs to die in this way (could it be a ban on lead solder?), these lights have caused me to ask another question: Is LED lighting really ready to take the place of incandescents?
I currently rent my home, and both finances and space are tight for me. Thus, stockpiling incandescent lights are impractical at this moment. I hate fluorescent lights, so I have hopes that LEDs will be ready and affordable after incandescent lights are banned. And while I expect that the Free Market will win in the end, we, unfortunately do not have a Free Market--as illustrated by the ban of incandescent light bulbs.
But seeing these lights flicker have caused me to wonder: will the LED lights really last as long as claimed? We already know that fluorescent lights don't--turning them on and off like we do incandescents are abusive to those lights, as is putting them in enclosures and in ceiling fans.
We really should let the Free Market work these details out!
When will we say "Enough!"?
This last weekend, I attended a family reunion for my wife's first cousins. During one of the evenings, the discussion turned to building permits, to home owner associations, and other such nonsense. Among the stories:
In particular, why do we put up with Home Owner Associations? I've seen these neighborhoods, and they are drab, boring, and soulless...but then, I suppose that's what you get when you care more about your property walues than you do about your neighbor's freedoms.
When will we say to our local governments, "I don't need your permission to build on my property!"?
And when will we say to local, state, and even federal, inspectors: "I will build to whatever code I see fit to build to--and if I build a fire hazard, or a house that will collapse in an earthquake, or a house where the ceiling collapses--then I will take responsibility for it myself, up to and including manslaughter for the death of those I love!"?
At what point will we start to stand up to these subtle--and, in many cases, not so subtle--attacks on our liberties?
- Someone built a shed five or six square feet beyond the limit before requiring a building permit. Because a building permit was too expensive, the person tore down the building, and then built a two-story shed exactly one square feet below the minimum. Furthermore, this person spent most of his money building the first shed, and so this new shed was built a plank at a time, producing a significant eyesore for the neighborhood.
- Another person added a room to his house. In order to afford the permit, he had to put in two little windows, and only four outlets per wall--but quietly made provisions to expand the window, and add more outlets, after he was finished. While the inspector was angry afterward, this person made it clear to the inspector, and later, to the judge, that it was legal to alter his home without a building permit.
- A person managed to move into a new neighborhood without signing Home Owner Association papers; thus, he painted his house freely, without regard to HOA restrictions. Somehow, the HOA managed to find a loophole anyway (I can't remember the details), and required this person to paint his home using Approved Colors(TM). So he did: he chose a drab brown, and then painted his entire house that color. He then refused to water his grass, and when the HOA complained, he just painted it green.
In particular, why do we put up with Home Owner Associations? I've seen these neighborhoods, and they are drab, boring, and soulless...but then, I suppose that's what you get when you care more about your property walues than you do about your neighbor's freedoms.
When will we say to our local governments, "I don't need your permission to build on my property!"?
And when will we say to local, state, and even federal, inspectors: "I will build to whatever code I see fit to build to--and if I build a fire hazard, or a house that will collapse in an earthquake, or a house where the ceiling collapses--then I will take responsibility for it myself, up to and including manslaughter for the death of those I love!"?
At what point will we start to stand up to these subtle--and, in many cases, not so subtle--attacks on our liberties?
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
A New Snow Ordinance
Today I learned on the radio that Salt Lake County is considering an ordinance to require people to shovel their sidewalks within 24 hours of a snowstorm, or face a $50 to $100 fine. The purpose of this is to make Salt Lake more pedestrian, bike, and wheelchair friendly.
Have these people no heart? Consider, especially, that provisions are not made for the following:
It's up to the goodness and kindness of the hearts of the officers, and later, the judges, enforcing this ordinance, to make exceptions for such cases.
The article I linked to blames "absentee landlords" and "businesses" as the worst offenders. Isn't it the tenant who is responsible, and not the landlord? Oh, wait, it is, except for those big apartment complexes--but even then, will there be no sympathy for those landlord companies that have enough staff to fix things, but not enough to make the rounds for shoveling the snow for all their properties--and who may not be able to pay for extra help, because it's monstrously difficult to hire new people (thank you, IRS!), and because they may already be operating "close to the metal"?
Furthermore, if I recall correctly, if a business is next to a sidewalk, and that sidewalk is next to a street (very common in downtown Salt Lake), then that business owner cannot legally shovel that snow into the street. For the longest time, I've wondered what business owners are supposed to do with that snow.
Clarification: It was my original understanding (from the radio blurb) that this ordinance was new; according to this article, though, that this ordinance has been around for twenty years, and this is just an attempt to make it more strict.
Have these people no heart? Consider, especially, that provisions are not made for the following:
- Those with disabilities,
- Widows,
- Single mothers with young children,
- Families on vacation,
- Those attempting to sell an empty house, possibly while out-of-state.
It's up to the goodness and kindness of the hearts of the officers, and later, the judges, enforcing this ordinance, to make exceptions for such cases.
The article I linked to blames "absentee landlords" and "businesses" as the worst offenders. Isn't it the tenant who is responsible, and not the landlord? Oh, wait, it is, except for those big apartment complexes--but even then, will there be no sympathy for those landlord companies that have enough staff to fix things, but not enough to make the rounds for shoveling the snow for all their properties--and who may not be able to pay for extra help, because it's monstrously difficult to hire new people (thank you, IRS!), and because they may already be operating "close to the metal"?
Furthermore, if I recall correctly, if a business is next to a sidewalk, and that sidewalk is next to a street (very common in downtown Salt Lake), then that business owner cannot legally shovel that snow into the street. For the longest time, I've wondered what business owners are supposed to do with that snow.
Clarification: It was my original understanding (from the radio blurb) that this ordinance was new; according to this article, though, that this ordinance has been around for twenty years, and this is just an attempt to make it more strict.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Martial Arts Pirate Alert!
I've been seeing these "9mm Won't Save You" advertisements all over the place, and just now, I finally decided to click on an ad, and see what they're claiming. Among their claims:
- How to get away from a larger attacker who surprises you. (It's instantaneous, keeps you safe from any blows, and puts him so "off-balanced" he's toast for your next move. And the beauty is... the bigger he is, the easier it is for you to do this!)
- How to snatch a loaded gun right out of a "Gangsta's" hand so [darn] fast it will literally tear his trigger finger off! (And then immediately, without even thinking about it, put him down for the count without even skipping a beat.)
- How to break up the most common street attacks with a single, simple move. (Instantly "cancels out" anything an experienced street fighter can throw at you.)
- And while I'm CERTAINLY NOT going to promise you will become a TRAINED KILLER overnight...
I CAN guarantee you will have the skills, confidence and near-magical ability to protect your family in a violent attack and NEVER fear any man ever again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)